↑ Return to Fun

Strange way to make friends: using photos of little girls from child modeling websites – I met a potential pedophile?

Short story: I love collecting photos with people, mostly actors and artists, of all ages 10-40+ years old, and became friend with an architect thanks to youngest girls, he also made me aware of “child modeling” phenomenon, and I became suspicious about his psychological health. Although I collected some photos from child modeling websites, I am mostly disgusted by what I see, children posed in erotic manner, and I wish authorities to STOP this kind of children abuse.

 

Full story: During the night of 9-10 September 2009, while running ARES (P2P filesharing software, popular for piracy in Latin America, used by me to download latin music which is my favorite music), I was contacted by a stranger who was not even patient to reply at his chat, he started sending me pictures with black little girls, topless, etc. I told him “what is this piece of shit? Stop sending!“, He said “I though that you will like, you are sharing such pictures“.

He asked if I want to exchange private files, I said YES with one condition: NO PORN. I started sending him pictures from my collection, artists of all ages, together with amateur photos from Webshots, fashion photos from Amazon, photos with babies, photos with cats and dogs, etc. He liked especially the photos with Maria Isabel (9-year old girl who won Junior Eurovision Song Contest in 2004) plus the photos with children from Webshots especially the ones where panties were visible. He sent me pictures of “models”, underage girls, but 90% of what he was sending me was disgusting so I deleted them immediately!

What actually happened: while looking for Latin music, videos, and photos with artists, I accidentally downloaded a porn movie with black people having filename similar with music artists, the downloaded files are automatically put in my shared files for other people to download from me. He was 25 years old, and just broke his leg, being bored at home he started looking online for friends interested in “porn and little girls”. He downloaded from me photos with underage artists as well as that porn movie, thus he wrongly though that I like underage porn with blacks. I was never aware that on ARES when you download files from someone you can start a chat with him.

In 2009 I was myself looking to make friends in other countries. I gave him my Yahoo! ID to keep in touch in Yahoo! Messenger, as I do not know if we will ever met again on ARES. Next night he contacted me again starting chatting about music, criticizing my musical preferences, I asked him what other interests / hobbies he have, I showed him my hobbies including 3D buildings designed by me, and he revealed that is an architect in United Kingdom. I told him that instead of sending disgusting photos with little girls, to give me comments about the building models (designed as hobby for 3D modeling) but he was taking my architecture hobby too in serious and was comparing with his own professional drawings, despite that I told him that I don’t have architectural school like him, he was telling me often “forget architecture, let’s exchange girls”.

By this way, he made me aware of the “child modeling” websites.

Friends opinion: I asked a friend 18 year old, what he thinks about child modeling and about photos that the architect was sending me, and I had an unexpected reaction, he started insulting me, calling me pedophile and accusing me for looking on child modeling websites to masturbate, and all what I want is sex with these girls. This friend thinks too much about sex and do not understand that having photos with girls does not mean willing to have sex with them, or that I am AGAINST underage sex.

We both love girls, but in a different way.

Most boys love sex and porn. I am an exception. Porn makes me sick so I avoid watching it, I also do not like looking at girls in swimsuit as much I like girls in skirts and shorts. I have a special interest for fashion. I love girls and women if they dress nicely and love kids in the way a teacher love his pupils or an entertainer of a children TV show (as I watch a lot of children shows at TV).

Regarding the architect, I became suspicious about his psychological health, because he also sent me photos of completely naked little girls and asked me to send him such photos if I have. When I sent him photos of mature women he did not liked. I asked him why he collects photos with underage girls almost naked, what he do with them, if he gets horny and if he wants to have sex, he said that this is just a fantasy, an he is like me against sex with children. Are you fucking serious?

We talked often for about 2 weeks until his health recovered. After few months of break, we talked again. Despite having 2 common interests, our friendship was not good, I wished to talk more with him about architecture, because I did not liked to exchange photos of little girls. Last time I saw him online was in August 2010.

What does the “child modeling” mean

Fashion designers, film directors, event organizers, etc, all need models, including children. But since the Internet era, a new type of business appeared, commonly known as NONUDE child modeling, which became very popular.

The agencies supposedly promote models, the girls, which can be hired by fashion designers, agency itself do not promote any brand of clothing, but offer subscription that cost dozens of dollars per month to see sets of photos (later I discovered that subscription system is a standard for adult/porn websites). I was always asking WHO are those people who pay subscription?

Girls aged 5-15 years (girls only), having albums wearing various outfits, each album having 50-100 pictures posing in all possible positions, there is a free preview of one photo and the rest available for members who pay subscriptions. At some agencies the first pictures are decent, but across the set, she take clothes off until remain in underwear (if she is not in underwear from start), sometimes topless, with breasts covered by hand or hair. In most photos the camera was focused on butt, thighs, between legs, etc, giving impression that the photos are taken for purpose of making men horny, and police can not do anything, because as long the genital organs are not visible, this is not considered child pornography.

Some websites that say “NO-NUDE 100% LEGAL” but some of them also say “You must BE 18 to enter”. What does that mean? Sites with little girls dedicated for adults? This sounds like pedophilia!

Examples:

ThePeopleImage: this is a child modeling website that I like a bit, all girls posed in natural landscape and with clothing suitable for their age, We Are Little Stars sub-site contains 5 sets for each girl of which at least one in pants, one in skirt/dress, one in swimsuit posed on beach. It also have miniseries, sub-sites dedicated for a single girl, wearing dozens or hundreds outfits. However, why they do not have boys? I am not gay, but what if someone have a boy who want to be model?

At a deeper analysis, we can see that the modeling agency born in 2001 have headquarters in Rio de Janeiro, but the site is in English, the only page in Portuguese is the page about hiring models. Few Brazilians speak English, a Brazilian fashion designer would do Google searches in Portuguese to find local girls, in which case their website would be hard to be found, the website being in English will appear at Google searches done by Americans. An American fashion designer would have reasons to hire to models in Brazil? Probably not!

Conclusion: the website, using the label of a modeling agency, generate its revenue probably 90% from American pedophiles who pay monthly subscription to see pictures of underage girls. A controversial business at the limit of legality!

Mini-Models: another Brazilian agency with girls in normal clothing and just few swimwear.

Vladmodels: Russian agency with some nice girls photoed with normal clothing with no erotism, panty shorts are avoided, but same agency have also models posed mostly in bikini and lingerie that I don’t like.

Tinymodel: example: tinymodel-amber.info, lots of photos in shorts and other sport clothing, but photos taken in positions too erotic in my opinion.

Newstar: example: newstar-diana.org, same kind of photos like Tinymodel, possibly operated by same company. Newstar also have boy models, shirtless and colorful shorts which is again too erotic.

Magazine-Fashion aka http://good-models.net/, apparently a magazine promoting swimwear,but actually just an online site offering little girl photos for subscription, photos made apparently to make men horny. I wish the producers to DIE IN HELL!

Chemal: lots of sites like somegirlname-model.net which for many years I was not aware that they are produced by same agency. 90% of photos are in panties, in some sets girls start well clothed then remove some of clothing. All photos indoor and do not show any art, just erotism. Based in Czech. Hope the producers will DIE IN HELL!

Artmodeling: one of the sickest things I ever seen, girls in tiny panties showing naked butt in 90% of photos and sexual positions. Example: http://trixie.artmodeling-studios.net/tour.html and some people reviewing it as “disturbing website”: http://www.dance.net/topic/10108622/1/Secrets-PG-13/I-came-across-a-disturbing-website.html. Clicking LEGAL button shows “All artistic work contained on this website abides by US and International Laws and does not contain lewd, obscene, or lascivious poses nor anything sexually explicit”, honestly this is VERY SEXUAL. Unknown country. I hope the owners to go to jail and parents who allowed their girls to be posed like this to DIE IN HELL!

LS models: this is the only “modeling agency” closed down by police in 2004, as they were posing kids naked. Wikileaks does have an article about how they operated: https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Talk:An_insight_into_child_porn.

The list continue with many agencies less famous.

Recent research

Kristina Pimenova, a 10-year old girl became famous in 2015-2016 thanks to the Facebook and Instagram photos, accounts managed by her mom, she got contracts with several famous fashion designers. But her photos are also receiving sexual comments as well as comments criticizing people who left the sexual comments. According Wikipedia: Pimenova’s mother manages her social media accounts, and there has been criticism of the content as an example of sexualisation of an under-age model. The mother disagrees, maintaining that all the photos are perfectly innocent and “you must think like a pedophile in order to see something sexual in these pictures

On Facebook lots of kids post themselves photos with little clothing. Parents also post photos of their little girls on the beach, which can be collected by pedophiles. On YouTube lots of kids post themselves videos, and I noticed that most videos where panties are visible under skirt, get sexual comments.

We live in a world of sexually-obsessed people and pedophiles, we cannot ban taking photos of children and child modeling just because of these sick people.

But some of the above “modeling websites” looks being made specially for these sick pedophiles.

There are various forums, where (sick) people exchange these photos, forums often having both nude 18+ models and nonude under-18 models, revealing that these little girl models are often collected by people with interest for nudity, porn and sex. Most forums have rules such as “do not post girls under 13, do not post illegal content such as nudity if model is under 18”, so photos in underwear are legal although immoral in my opinion.

Recently I noticed that Google has BANNED from search results all the websites that sell photos via subscription system, nonude children or nude adult models, forums where people exchange these photos are also banned. Most likely they banned websites containing the famous girl names in this modeling world. Modeling websites who promote girls just using few photos, without selling large photo albums for money, remained in Google search results. ThePeopleImage which in my opinion was a legit agency, with no inappropriate pictures, and not using “nonude” tag, was also banned.

While Google banned them, you can still find them on Bing, Yahoo or Yandex. If you want to see what I am talking about, and get shocked, do a search “nonude” on Yahoo Images.

Conclusion

Over next years I showed this story and the child modeling websites to various people from various corners of world, teenagers as well as parents with kids, and got mixed opinions, some saying that photos are acceptable while others saying that such websites should be banned.

For example, 40-year old people, including parents of girls, said that the pictures are normal, acceptable, but now depends on how each person see the pictures, for example they love to see their own girl beautiful like girls on ThePeopleImage, but there may be also pedophiles who thinks about sex when they view little girls photos.

Why there are no boys? I do not say that I am gay or that I love seeing boys, but what if I have a son who wants to become a model?

One day, some 12-year boys visited me, I showed them photos of 12-year girls. I though that they would like girls of same age, but nooo… they were not interested in this type of girls because is not porn (yes, 12-year old boys watch porn!), moreover they called me pedophile.

At the opposite side, someone said that child modeling websites are the worst thing ever seen, and that nobody under 18 should be a “model”.

What is YOUR opinion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>